Different site for cell tower


Published on Tuesday, March 2, 2010 10:19 PM PST

Some say that there is no radiation danger from cell phone towers, and some say there is a great danger.  Either way, our property values will go down if that tower is placed in our residential neighborhood simply because of the public perception that there is a danger. Nobody wants that thing in their yard and it’s presence would have to be disclosed in any real estate deal, and then the deal’s off.

Verizon needs to find a different site for the tower, and Kern County Planning must deny the zone variance and conditional use permit. Do you hear this, Supervisor McQuiston?

Colin Edwards

Kernville

 

Comments

1 comment(s)

    thoughtful contributor wrote on Mar 3, 2010 12:46 PM:

    " Or one could argue that access to reliable cell service and internet service would be something a potential buyer of property within Kernville may view as benefit. I do not believe that a cell phone tower is a required real estate dicslosure. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive, off-topic, repetitious and/or redundant content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   


Multimedia

Classifieds

Contact us: 760 379 3667
Click for Lake Isabella, California Forecast